Scientifically Unfounded
Hemp Fabric Claims at Çatalhöyük: Scientifically Unfounded
The claim that Professor Ian Hodder discovered 9,000-year-old hemp fabric at Çatalhöyük has been definitively refuted by peer-reviewed scientific analysis.
This represents a clear case where preliminary archaeological interpretations made in 2013-2014 were later corrected through rigorous scientific investigation, but the original sensationalized claims continue circulating in unreliable sources.
The Definitive Scientific Evidence Contradicts Hemp Claims
The authoritative correctioncame in 2021
when leading textile archaeologists published a comprehensive study in *Antiquity*, one of archaeology’s most prestigious journals. Antoinette Rast-Eicher (University of Bern), Sabine Karg (Free University of Berlin), and Lise Bender Jørgensen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) used advanced scanning electron microscopy to reanalyze Çatalhöyük textiles. Their findings were unambiguous: **the fabrics were made from oak bast fibers, not hemp or linen.
This peer-reviewed analysis examined both materials excavated in the 1960s and from recent excavations. The researchers found that previous identifications as flax were incorrect, noting that “in the past, researchers largely neglected the possibility that the fabric fibres could be anything other than wool or linen.” The scientific evidence shows these 8,500-8,700-year-old textiles were crafted from locally available tree bast—oak, elm, and willow/poplar—using sophisticated end-to-end splicing techniques.
The archaeological context supports tree bast identification.
Only twelve flax seeds have ever been found at Çatalhöyük, and these appeared only in early occupation layers, not the middle phase where textiles were discovered. Oak trees grew abundantly in the region and were harvested for construction, making their bark fibers readily available as a waste product for textile production.
No Legitimate Academic Sources Support Hodder’s Alleged Hemp Statements
Despite extensive searches through Ian Hodder’s official publications, the Çatalhöyük Research Project archives, and peer-reviewed archaeological literature, **no credible academic sources document Hodder making statements about hemp-linen fabric discoveries**. The hemp claims appear exclusively in non-academic sources without proper citation to official research publications.
Hodder’s documented academic work includes “Çatalhöyük: The Leopard’s Tale,” multiple excavation reports, and numerous peer-reviewed articles, but none mention hemp textile discoveries. The textile analysis was conducted by specialist collaborators who published their authoritative findings in the 2021 *Antiquity* study, which definitively contradicts the hemp claims.
Source Credibility Analysis Reveals Fundamental Problems
The sources promoting hemp claims **fail basic credibility standards for archaeological information. Ancient Origins is rated by Media Bias/Fact Check as a “conspiracy-pseudoscience” source with “low credibility” that promotes ancient aliens theories alongside legitimate archaeology. Professional archaeologists extensively critique it for spreading “fake-archaeology” and misinformation.
Hurriyet Daily News, while a legitimate Turkish newspaper, receives “mixed credibility” ratings due to poor sourcing practices and tabloid-style sensationalism. Archaeology Wiki operates as a user-generated platform without apparent professional archaeological oversight or peer review processes.
None of these sources are cited by legitimate archaeological institutions, and all lack the rigorous editorial standards expected for credible archaeological claims.
Scientific Methodology Exposes Analytical Limitations
The alleged hemp identification lacks scientific foundation. No laboratory reports or detailed analytical methodology were ever published, supporting the hemp claims. The preservation mechanism described as a “kiln-drying effect” has no recognition in archaeological preservation literature, which recognizes carbonization, mineralization, waterlogged conditions, and extreme environments as standard preservation mechanisms.
Modern fiber identification requires sophisticated techniques including scanning electron microscopy, polarized light microscopy with statistical analysis of multiple samples, and x-ray microdiffraction for unambiguous results. The 2021 study employed these rigorous methods and found consistent identification of oak bast across all analyzed samples.
Timeline Analysis Confirms Chronological Possibility but Scientific Impossibility
While hemp cultivation evidence from China (~8000 BCE) theoretically aligns with Çatalhöyük’s occupation period (7400-6200 BCE), making hemp presence chronologically possible, the archaeological context contradicts hemp use. The site shows no evidence of hemp cultivation, no hemp seeds in extensive archaeobotanical analyses, and abundant local tree bast alternatives that were actually identified through scientific analysis.
The claimed 9,000-year dating would place the textiles around 7000 BCE, within Çatalhöyük’s occupation span, but the rigorous 2021 analysis using Bayesian radiocarbon dating and advanced fiber identification proves these were oak bast textiles, not hemp.
Scholarly Correction Demonstrates Scientific Self-Correction
This case exemplifies how archaeological science corrects preliminary interpretations through rigorous peer review. The hemp claims represent preliminary field interpretations from 2013-2014 that were superseded by sophisticated laboratory analysis. The 2021 *Antiquity* study and subsequent 2023 confirmatory research in the *Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports* establish the current scientific consensus.
The actual discovery—that Neolithic peoples developed sophisticated textile technology using locally sourced oak bast fibers—represents genuine scientific significance without sensationalized claims about “world’s first hemp fabric.”
Conclusion
This case beautifully illustrates how archaeological science evolves and improves over time. What began as preliminary field interpretations in 2013-2014 was refined through sophisticated laboratory analysis, leading to the remarkable discovery that Neolithic peoples developed advanced textile technology using locally sourced oak bast fibers.
The 2021 peer-reviewed research didn’t diminish the significance of Çatalhöyük’s textiles—it enhanced our understanding of them. These 8,500-8,700-year-old woven fabrics remain among the world’s oldest preserved textiles, representing an extraordinary achievement of ancient craftsmanship and ingenuity.
This is how good science works: researchers build on previous work, apply new technologies, and refine our knowledge. Each generation of archaeologists brings better tools and methods, helping us understand the past more clearly. The story of Çatalhöyük’s textiles shows that even when specific interpretations change, the wonder of human achievement in the archaeological record only grows deeper and more fascinating.
Leave a Reply